Partnermagazin logo 31

ORJR Ě GDV &$0/2* 3DUWQHU 0DJD]LQ Ě 'H]HPEHU WISSENSCHAFT / KLINISCHE FORSCHUNG 8 LITERATUR Becker J, Ferrari D, Herten M, Kirsch A, Schaer A, Schwarz F. (2007) Influence of platform switching on crestal bone changes at non-submerged titani- um implants: a histomorphometrical study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 34 (12):1089-96 Becker J, Ferrari D, Mihatovic I, Sahm N, Schaer A, Schwarz F. (2009) Stability of crestal bone level at platform-switched non-submerged titanium implants: a histomorphometrical study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 36(6):532-9 Becker K, Mihatovic I, Golubovic V, Schwarz F. (2012) Impact of abutment material and dis-/ re-connection on soft and hard tissue changes at implants with platform-switching. J Clin Periodon- tol 39(8):774-80 Dittmer S, Dittmer MP, Kohorst P, Jendras M, Borchers L, Stiesch M. (2011) Effect of implant- abutment connection design on load bearing ca- pacity and failure mode of implants. J Prosthodont 20(7):510-6 Edinger D, Kahler E, Hilgers R. (2007) Unter- suchung der Rotationspassgenauigkeit. BDIZ EDI konkret 2:68–71 Schwarz F, Herten M, Bieling K, Becker J. (2008) Crestal bone changes at non-submerged implants (Camlog ® ) with different machined collar lengths. A histo-morphometrical pilot study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 23:335–342 Mehl C, Harder S, Schwarz D, Steiner M, Vollrath O, Kern M. (2012a) In vitro influence of ultrasonic stress, removal force preload and thermocycling on the retrievability of implant-retained crowns. Clin Oral Implants Res 23(8):930-7 Mehl C, Harder S, Shahriari A, Steiner M, Kern M. (2012b) Influence of abutment height and ther- mocycling on retrievability of cemented implant- supported crowns. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 27(5):1106-15 Mehl C, Becker ST, Acil Y, Harder S, Wiltfang J, Dabbagh-Afrouz AA, de Buhr W, Kern M. (2013) Impact of vertical loading on the implant-bone interface. Clin Oral Implants Res 24(8):949-56 Reinert M, Geis-Gerstorfer J. (2007) Vergleichende Untersuchung zur Passgenauigkeit von prothe- tisch-zahntechnischen Komponenten verschie- dener Implantatsysteme. Deutsche Zahnärztliche Zeitschrift 62:668–674 Stimmelmayr M, Edelhoff D, Güth JF, Erdelt K, Happe A, Beuer F. (2012) Wear at the titanium- titanium and the titanium-zirconia implant-abut- ment interface: A comparative in vitro study. Dent Mater 28(12):1215-20 Semper W, Kraft S, Krüger T, Nelson K. (2009) Theoretical optimum of implant positional index design. J Dent Res 88(8):731-5 Semper W, Heberer S, Mehrhof J, Schink T, Nelson K. (2010) Effects of repeated manual disassembly and reassembly on the positional stability of vari- ous implant-abutment complexes: an experimental study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 25(1):86-94 Semper-Hogg W, Kraft S, Stiller S, Mehrhof J, Nelson K. (2013) Analytical and experimental po- sition stability of the abutment in different dental implant systems with a conical implant-abutment connection. Clin Oral Investig 17(3):1017-23 A B C D Abb. 3A: Um 0,4 mm suprakrestal eingesetzte Implan- tate (K-Serie), entsprechend dem Standard-Chirurgie- protokoll. Abb.3B: Eingesetztes Implantat, abgedeckt mit einem nicht passenden Gingivaformer (Platform Switching). Abb. 3C: Implantat mit Standard-Gin- givaformer (Kontrolle), Histologie nach 6 Monaten Heilung. Abb. 3D: Implantat mit nicht passendem Gingivaformer (Platform Switching), Histologie nach sechs Monaten Heilung. Der Knochenverlust ist im Vergleich zur Standardkonfiguration leicht erniedrigt. Mit freundlicher Genehmigung von Prof. Dr. F. Schwarz CAMLOG&SCIENCE – CHAPTER 1 CAMLOG AND SCIENCE a perfect fit ™