Partner Magazine logo 15

logo 39 • the CAMLOG Partner Magazine • November 2016 19 Conclusion This case demonstrates that even extensive restorations, both surgical and prosthetic, can be mastered in a predictable manner by using proven methods and materials. The close cooperation between dentist, patient and dental laboratory, without which such a result would not have been possible, needs to be emphasized yet again. Our thanks go to the IDEAL Dental, laboratory in Bad Wörishofen for their excellent technical performance. CASE STUDY [1] A Mericske-Stern: Das Abrasionsgebiss bei älteren Menschen – Diagnostik und Strategien; Die Quintessenz 2007;58:729-737 [2] Abduo J, Lyons K: Clinical considerations for increasing occlusal vertical dimension: a review. Aust Dent J. 2012 Mar;57(1):2-10 [3] Seay A. Transitional bonding with the Kois deprogram- mer: a conservative treatment approach. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2012 Nov-Dec;33(10):758-63 [4] Ahlers MO, Möller K: Repositions-Onlays und -Veneers zur atraumatischen Restauration einer physiologischen Kiefer- und Kondylenposition. Quintessenz 2011;62:211–222 [5] Tarnow DP, Magner AW, Fletcher P: The effect of the distance from the contact point to the crest of bone on the presence or absence of a interproximal papilla. J Periodontol 1992 Dec;63(12):995-6 [6] Hermann JS, Cochran DL: Biologische Prinzipien in der oralen Implantologie. Implantologie 2005; 13(2):109-123 [7] Lavigne GJ, Khoury S, Abe S, Yamaguchi T, Raphael K. Bruxism physiology and pathology: an overview for clini- cians. J Oral Rehabil. 2008;35:476-494. 15. Johannsson A, Johannsson AK, Omar R, Carlsson GE. Rehabilitation of the worn dentition. J Oral Rehabil. 2008;35:548–566 [8] Lobbezoo F, Ahlberg J, Glaros AG, Kato T, Koyano K, Lavigne GJ, et al. Bruxism defined and graded: an international consensus. J Oral Rehabil. 2013;40:2-4 [9] Edelhoff D, Sorensen JA: Tooth structure removal associ- ated with various designs for posterior teeth. Int J Periodont Restorative Dent 22, 241–249 (2002) LITERATURE